The suggested resolution to a healthcare predicament is transparent communication among Nurse Amelia Brooks, Dr. Rebecca Martin, and patient Sophie Turner. This conversation upholds the principle of patients’ autonomy and acknowledges Amelia’s dissent over elective abortion. All parties involved articulate their viewpoints, principles, and apprehensions. Amelia would articulate her moral ideas and worries, while Dr. Martin would participate in polite dialogues, considering ethical values and her colleague’s worldview. Sophie Turner would actively engage in decision-making, ensuring that her autonomy and preferences are considered. This strategy enhances Amelia’s productivity, promotes ethical dialogue, and cultivates a diverse and welcoming workplace (Tillman et al., 2023). It reconciles divergent perspectives, cultivates positive interpersonal connections, and upholds healthcare ethics.
Nurse Amelia Brooks is confronted with an ethical predicament involving conscientious objection and professional duty. This intricate matter encompasses conflicting notions of self-governance, professional accountability, and avoiding harm. The Ethical Decision-Making Model facilitates comprehension of the situation. Effective communication, cooperation, and comprehension are essential in navigating this ethical domain. By acknowledging and valuing diverse belief systems and promoting open and honest communication, healthcare practitioners may discover ethical resolutions that uphold the well-being of patients and the self-governing rights of all individuals involved. Healthcare practitioners must possess effective communication, teamwork, and commitment to ethical standards to manage ethical challenges successfully.
Apay, S. E., Gürol, A., Gür, E. Y., & Church, S. (2020). Midwifery students’ reactions to ethical dilemmas encountered in outpatient clinics. Nursing Ethics, 27(7), 1542–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020922875
Carvajal, B., White, H., Brooks, J., Thomson, A. M., & Cooke, A. (2022). Experiences of midwives and nurses when implementing abortion policies: A systematic integrative review. Midwifery, p. 111, 103363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103363
Hasselbacher, L. A., Hebert, L. E., Liu, Y., & Stulberg, D. B. (2020). “My hands are tied”: Abortion restrictions and providers’ experiences in religious and nonreligious health care systems. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 52(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12148
McCarthy, J., & McGuinness, S. (2020). Conscience, conscientious objection, and commitment: midwives, nurses, and abortion care. In Springer eBooks (pp. 149–169). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49104-8_10
Tillman, S., Eagen‐Torkko, M., & Levi, A. (2023). Ethics, abortion access, and Emergency Care Post‐Dobbs: the gray Areas. Journal of Midwifery & Women S Health, 68(6), 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13598
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!